The 4 squares problem – extended
May 1st, 2010 admin
A “4 Squares Puzzle” is doing the rounds over the internet nowadays. here are the original Microsoft Powerpoint slides which I received via email from my father. (Not sure who the original author of these slides is, but the slides report the author to be Nakit Yonetimi.) It may be useful to look over the pdf file once before proceeding. The question posted in the slides is different from the one I am going to pose, but going through the slides helps build context and helps get mentally warmed up.
The question I posed to myself after thinking through the puzzle was, “How can we divide a square into 7 equal parts with only a straight edge and a compass available?” Note that the question implies that we do not have a ruler or a scale. We have a straight edge, but without any markings on it to indicate inches or centimeters. Even if it did have the markings, such markings can only measure accurately up to a certain level. For example, say you have a scale with markings at the granularity of a millimeter. Say the square had a side equal to some irrational number, say or
, or, even a simple integer which is not a multiple of 7, such as, 8 millimeters. There is no way to measure
or
or
millimeters using such a scale.
There are at least 2 approaches to dividing this square into 7 parts. The first is a simpler approach and the second is slightly more involved. Let me talk about the second one first. The first one will then become easy to see. The main intuition behind the first idea is that a triangle’s area depends only on its base and height. If we can mark out 7 equidistant points along the square’s border, thus creating 7 equal bases, we can join the bases to the center of the square to create 7 regions with equal areas. The heights of these shapes will be equal, and the bases are equal by construction. Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Family, Tidbits | No Comments »